Legislative Assembly of British Columbia


Go To Advanced Search Page

British Columbia Teachers’ Institute on Parliamentary Democracy

Lesson Plan

Title

Democracy: The Right to Disagree and the Responsiblity to Cooperate

Audience

Social Studies 8 - 12, Civic Studies 11.

Overview

Within a unit on government in British Columbia, this is a lesson that can be used to demonstrate two tenets of democracy: the right to disagree and the responsibility to cooperate. Before this lesson, students should have an understanding of the historical roots of the Canadian political and legal systems.

Objectives

Apply critical thinking skills, including: questioning, comparing, summarizing, drawing conclusions, and defending a position.

Activities and Method

  1. Familiarize students with your School's Code of Conduct.
  2. Show Question Period. Observe the behaviour of the Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) and document. (See Appendix A)
  3. Discuss observations (Think, Pair, Share or Partner Talk).
  4. Determine if the observations meet the tenets of your School's Code of Conduct - use the Yes/No columns in Appendix A to record your decisions.
  5. Conduct classroom discussions using a selection of questions. (See Appendix B).
  6. In groups (of 2, 3, 4) create a poster-sized Code of Conduct for MLAs during Question Period.
Extensions
  1. Orally defend created Code of Conduct.
  2. Gallery walk of posted Codes of Conduct.
  3. Rank Code of Conduct tenets and justify (individual or group).
  4. Create a summative class Code of Conduct for MLAs.

Preparation

Teacher Preparation
  1. Access the indexes, from Hansard's main page (http://www.leg.bc.ca/hansard/index.htm), click on "Indexes" under "Debates of the Legislative Assembly" to obtain a documented session of Question Period.
  2. Access a copy of your School's Code of Conduct.

Duration of Activity

2-3 lessons, perhaps 3-5 with extensions.

Learning Outcomes

It is expected that students will:

  • demonstrate effective skills, including: assessing information, evaluating information, organizing information, and presenting information
  • demonstrate effective written, oral or graphic communication skills collaboratively
  • evaluate the relative abilities of individuals, governments, and non-government organizations to effect civic change in Canada and the world, with reference to considerations such as: power and influence, circumstances, methods of decision-making, action, and public opinion
  • assess the role and beliefs and values in civic decision making

Materials and Resources

  • Computer access to view archived Question Period.
  • Poster paper and markers.
  • Copies of Appendix A and B.
  • Copies of School's Code of Conduct

Evaluation of Activity

Completion-based activity (pass-fail). Note to teachers: evaluation may occur at multiple stages of this activity.

Submitted By

Alexis Aitken, George Bonner Middle School, SD #79, (Cowichan Valley)
Alana Check, Echo Bay Elementary School, SD #85, (Vancouver Island North)
Kirk Longpré, Mount Douglas Secondary School, SD #61, (Greater Victoria)
Krista Marrs, Okanagan Mission Secondary School, SD #23, (Kelowna)
Tamara Martin, L.V. Rogers Secondary School, SD#8, (Kootenay Lake)

NOTE: The ideas and opinions expressed in this classroom activity belong to their authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. The Public Education and Outreach office only edits for clarity.

 


Appendix – Handouts

Appendix A
Observation of Question Period

 

While you are watching Question Period, describe what you see and hear. Pay particular attention to verbal communication and body language.

Observations

Yes

No

  1.  

 

 

  1.  

 

 

  1.  

 

 

  1.  

 

 

  1.  

 

 

  1.  

 

 

  1.  

 

 

  1.  

 

 

  1.  

 

 

  1.  

 

 

 

 


 

Appendix B:
Discussion Questions

 

Is Question Period a political arena?

Is it verbal and emotional abuse during Question Period or is it fair game? Is it fair game (what is "fair game")?

Why are politics adversarial?

When is passion an asset, a liability or a hindrance?

Why is it permissible in our society to behave in a manner that is not acceptable in school? (What is the function of the Legislative Assembly? How does the Official Opposition factor in? What is the function of the school?)

The right to disagree, the responsibility to cooperate, how do things get accomplished in Parliament?

How does one disagree agreeably?

Do the theatrics in Question Period cause the general populous to become more interested or disillusioned in politics?

Why have some MLAs referred to Question Period as painful when no physical harm has come to them?

At what point does disagreement escalate to rudeness? What is the next level of escalation? Where might it end?

When does change outweigh the importance of tradition and vice versa?

Is Question Period a venue for politicians to vent frustrations in a socially responsible manner? (Two sword lengths being the distance between the Government and Opposition desks).

Why do politicians heckle, clap, or pound their desks during Question Period? Is this still an acceptable means of behaviour in Canada in the 21st century?

How does pack mentality influence events during Question Period? In politics?

What democratic rights does Question Period encompass?

If the Ministers don't need to answer the questions in Question Period, is it still democratic?

The role of the Speaker - what is it?

What influence does the Speaker have over the conduct of the MLAs during Question Period? How do Speakers approach this role across Canada? How does our present Speaker rank in maintaining decorum in Question Period?

Is the Speaker's role one of power or subservience?

What role does the Premier or the Leader of Official Opposition play in setting the decorum?